Top related persons:
Top related locs:
Top related orgs:

Search resuls for: "Teresa Ghilarducci"


6 mentions found


And more than half of that group will primarily rely on Social Security for income, according to new research from the Alliance for Lifetime Income. Deciding when to claim Social Security retirement benefits is a high stakes decision. Eligibility for retirement benefits starts at age 62. But full retirement age – generally age 66 or 67, depending on an individual's birth year — is when retirees may receive 100% of the benefits they've earned. For each year you wait past full retirement age up to 70, you may receive an 8% benefit boost.
Persons: , they've, Teresa Ghilarducci Organizations: Social Security, Alliance for Lifetime, Social, The New School for Social Research, Alliance, Lifetime Locations: New
Then you get to collect Social Security, on top of drawing from the nest egg you've built up over your career. The burden of saving for retirement — and the anxiety that comes with it — is a fairly new phenomenon. There's nothing irrational about being nervous that you won't have enough money to live on to last your whole life. The new system also allows people to dip into their retirement piles if need be — which can be both a blessing and a curse. AdvertisementIt's not likely that Social Security will just dry up — Congress could increase the retirement age or up the funding for the program.
Persons: they'll, Teresa Ghilarducci, , they'd, Larry Fink, there's, Fink, It's, they're, Norman Stein, Drexel University's Thomas R, Chris Woods, They're, Stein, Riley Moynes, it's, Woods, Emily Stewart Organizations: Social, CNBC, The New School, Workers, BlackRock, Drexel, Kline School of Law, Silvis, Social Security, GOP, Security, Business Locations: America, New, Charlotte , North Carolina
Then you get to collect Social Security, on top of drawing from the nest egg you've built up over your career. In a recent CNBC survey, over half of respondents in the US said they thought they were behind on saving and planning for retirement. The burden of saving for retirement — and the anxiety that comes with it — is a fairly new phenomenon. There's nothing irrational about being nervous that you won't have enough money to live on to last your whole life. AdvertisementIt's not likely that Social Security will just dry up — Congress could increase the retirement age or up the funding for the program.
Persons: they'll, Teresa Ghilarducci, , they'd, Larry Fink, there's, Fink, It's, they're, Norman Stein, Drexel University's Thomas R, Chris Woods, They're, Stein, Riley Moynes, it's, Woods, Emily Stewart Organizations: Social, CNBC, The New School, Workers, BlackRock, Drexel, Kline School of Law, Silvis, Social Security, GOP, Security, Business Locations: America, New, Charlotte , North Carolina
“Is this what America’s retirement system has come to?” she asks. “Are we heading for a TikTok pension system?”Ghilarducci argues that working longer is not the solution to America’s retirement crisis, in which millions of people don’t have enough money for a comfortable old age. The most important fix, she says, is to shore up Social Security and complement it with a new automatic-enrollment pension plan for workers who lack access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan. I’ve been arguing that working longer kind of is the solution for the retirement crisis, or at least part of the solution. “Yes, Granny deserves a good job if she wants one,” she writes, “but working until you drop is not a civilized plan for a civilized society.”
Persons: Teresa Ghilarducci, , Ghilarducci, I’ve, I’m, Granny, Organizations: Walmart, Social Security, New School for Social Research Locations: New, New York
watch nowMore than three-quarters of Americans, 77%, say the unavailability of pensions is making it harder to achieve the American Dream, according to a new report from the National Institute on Retirement Security. With the shift from pensions to 401(k)s, the responsibility for saving for retirement has transferred from employers to workers. "When not managed properly, defined benefit plans can end up like Ponzi schemes," Greszler said at Wednesday's Senate hearing. Neither Social Security nor multiemployer pensions can pay benefits as promised, she noted. To shore up Social Security, the average American household would have to pay at least $3,000 per year more in taxes, money that would better be invested in personal accounts, Greszler argued.
Persons: Rebecca Cook, Sara Schambers, Schambers, Teresa Ghilarducci, Ghilarducci, Rachel Greszler, Greszler, Sen, Bill Cassidy Organizations: United Auto Workers, Sterling Heights Assembly, Reuters, Ford, Washington , D.C, UAW, National Institute on Retirement Security, Pensions, Finance, Security, Workers, The New School for Social Research, The Heritage Foundation, Senate, Social Security Locations: Sterling Heights, Sterling Heights , Michigan, Washington ,, New
Sporrer/Rupp | Image Source | Getty ImagesParticipation in workplace retirement plans may soon be expanded, thanks to new efforts from lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Secure 2.0 would require certain employers with retirement plans to automatically enroll eligible workers in those plans. Create a universal retirement planFor starters, we should abandon the hope that employers will cover everyone with retirement plans, according to Ghilarducci. "A universal access plan is one in which everyone, regardless of what their employer does, is in a retirement plan," Ghilarducci said. The idea is included in the Retirement Savings for Americans Act, which would establish portable tax-advantaged retirement savings accounts for workers.
Total: 6